Suggestion for improved cue point snapping behavior in djay
Hi djay Team and fellow users,
I’ve been exploring the new version 5.3, and I wanted to share a suggestion that could make cue point management even more efficient.
I’ve also recorded a video demonstrating the issue and my suggestion. You can check it out here: ==> Watch the video
It’a about this point in 5.3.: Cue points now snap to closest beat when long pressing set cue
To provide some context, I typically work with a quantize mode of 1:16 on both decks. This allows for fast response times, which is important when adding quick effects or stuttering, and helps keep things responsive during my performance.
That being said, about my issue with the current cue point improvements in v5.3. Specifically, when I create cue points “on the fly” while playing a track, they don’t snap exactly to a beat due to the 1/16th quantize setting. Instead, the cue points are placed randomly within the grid. I understand that
with the new feature in v5.3, long-pressing the “Set Cue” button now causes the cue point to snap to the closest beat, which is a great improvement. However, I’d like to suggest a change to how this behavior works.
My suggestion is to reverse the current behavior:
- When I tap the cue point button shortly, it should immediately snap to the closest beat or bar (just like the current long-press behavior).
- When I long-press the cue point button, I’d like it to allow me to freely position the cue point at the exact point I’m pressing it (based on the Quantize setting), without snapping to the nearest beat or bar.
This way, when I’m quickly tapping to set cue points, they will always snap to the beat, which is what I (and most of us) need 9 out of 10 times. However, when I need more precise control, I want the option to place the cue point freely by holding the button.
It would be fantastic if this behavior could be the default or, even better, if there was an option to toggle it in the settings based on individual user preferences.
Thanks for considering this suggestion—I believe it would greatly improve flexibility and workflow for many DJs who want to maintain responsive cue point placement while also having precise control when needed.