What hardware controller are you using with dJay?
0 voters
Thank you very much for all the opinions. Of course I itensionally expressed some debatable opinions in my OP. I never ever wanted to insult anything or anyone. I explicitly wanted to start … exactly this … discussion. THX for all your input.
Hi again @doogie, can you please respond to my questions for earlier? I’d like to pass this feedback onto the dev team. Thanks!
I definitely agree that Djay should continue to support as many controllers as they can. I am more skeptical when it comes to things such as VR where I kind of doubt the size of the userbase for such a feature. I’d rather see stability and performance improvements, personally.
I’d love improvements to library management (ability to remove songs from playlists in Apple Music from inside of Djay would be nice), the ability to see the tracks inside of all of the playlists inside of a playlist folder (I have all my genre playlists inside of a DJ folder in Apple Music, but it’d be nice to be able to see and sort all tracks from all these playlists if I want to switch to a different genre), and pre-cacheing tracks from streaming when they’re in queue or the cursor is on them. Lastly, I think the ability to import/export beatgrids from Rekordbox and Serato would be a game changer.
Maybe I am wrong and there are a lot of people DJing on Quest and Vision Pro. But I know as someone DJing on desktop (and occasionally mobile), I’d rather see improvements in those fields.
Library sync is definitely the most important feature I’m looking forward, at least it should be sync between macOS and iOS, I’m so surprised that my Mac DJay playlist can’t be recognized by iPad. It’s a big deal to develop this feature I know, but it’s also adding so much value! I’m paying money to Lexicon and bought the DJ Utility to solve this, there’s definitely a potential here, as you might already know, most of DJ’s time spent on libraries management, not the club, not the VR world, home or studio scrolling songs and marking cues.
Which devices you’re using to prepare your sets?
0 voters
Definitely agree that library sync is a pain point. It gets annoying needing to re-analyze playlists and fix broken beatgrids every time I want to do a quick experiment on my phone. I would love to see more library management features built into Djay.
I am sure djay will become the market leader
for this you need
1 stable operation of basic functions
2 advanced mapping as in traktor ,virtualdj
3 elimination of existing disadvantages (refers to point 1)
bitjump, hot cue, synchronization speed
, but I really want to assign functions to the keyboard in more detail and be able to adjust them (speed, tempo
, multiple functions per key
, glad I discovered Jai
, looking forward to updates
with each new update +1 person
I distribute djay in Moscow
That. This is, apart from stability, is the only thing that makes me drool over traktor. It’s like programming and art combined. So many things you can do. I reaaaly look forward to advanced mapping and more possibilities with it in Djay!
I respectfully disagree @Wirelessdj.
I think we should not forget Algoriddim (just like any other company) does not have infinite ressources.
So, we cannot just say “we want everything”, and “everything is priority one”.
Scrolling thru many posts, I see consistency in some drawbacks with DJay :
Fwiw, my own experience is the following : I started with a Reloop Buddy and a DJay subscription. Then I had issues with the sound quality of the Buddy. I upgraded to DDJ-REV5. But now I am disappointed with the integration with Djay. The problem is that I have now invested $1000 in gear. And changing gear wouldn’t change anything, because other controllers have the same half backed integration issues with Djay. So, I am questioning whether I should switch to another software. And the main thing refraining me from doing this is the Apple Music integration, currently.
I humbly think my own experience is probably similar to many other customers. And this is not good for Djay. We need full integration with some controllers (even at the cost of a reduced set of controllers), and reliability.
We cannot have it all. Asking for everything, without concessions, won’t help Algoriddim to sort priorities, imho.
The truth might be : the hw vendors might not be interested to have additional compatible software.
Or to get the better support they might say “pay extra annual fee and then you have licenced support to open all features of the hw. We are happy to help you with annaual 1 000 000 $”.
Or for example iPad (iOS) need class compliant device, if hw vendors feels that “no we are not intersted as there is already full support for macOS”, then there’s not much anyone can do to solve the integration.
What’s the integration problem with the REV5?
I thought people were pretty happy with the REV5/DJayPro combo.
Like this guy:
What are disappointed in with the Rev5?
Hello everyone, sorry for the delay.
As I said above, my disappointment with the DDJ-REV5 / DJAY integration comes because I upgraded from the Reloop Buddy. You see both controllers in the picture below
This integration between Pad Modes only exists (currently) with the Reloop Buddy and Mixtour Pro.
There is currently no way to Map this in Djay. Meaning, on whatever other controller (including DDJ-REV5), you must touch the tablet to change this. Which is totally uncool. For this reason, I am actually not using my DDJ-REV5, hoping for Algoriddim to fix this.
But @Slak_Jaw has been asking for this for two years, and it is still not there.
And other point is one of the two specific key features of DDJ-REV5 “Piano Play” is not being mapped, contrary to what I heard from some users here before buying.
But this is something I can understand and accept. It is more of a specific feature. I don’t care too much. But I still wish I knew before buying.
Pad Modes shifting is something else. This MUST work.
There should not even be voting about this.
For me, Algoriddim cannot say “100% Compatible” when this basic and essential Pad Mode integration is not done at all. Djay has not even opened the mapping for this. We are stuck (for now). Nothing we can map about pad modes.
Coming back to the main subject (“Future of Algoriddim djay”), one of the key points is really to complete the integration with controllers, even at the cost of reducing the list.
Reloop Buddy and Mixtour are the two only ones truly fully integrated (as per @Slak_Jaw , thank you to him for being honest about this. It doesn’t solve the problem, but honesty is appreciated) .
For every other hardware, what Algoriddim does is a pre-mapping, like we could do ourselves.
But honestly, this is not what I call integration. This should be called “80% pre-mapped for your convenience”. And this leads to the point of reliability. When choosing from the “list of compatible hardware”, things should be said more clearly. It is even more important than screen integration.
I would much more prefer Algoriddim to complete the list of mappable functions (and jog-screen integration), rather that extend an infinite list of half backed pre-mappings.
Then… it gets worse :
So, at the end of the day, what do we have as really 100% integrated hardware : Absolutely nothing !
This is not sustainable for Algoriddim. This can’t work, imho.
If you agree about that integration between controllers and djay pad modes matters, please help the already long list of people requesting this for several years already by voting on this topic below :
I understand the issue of non-class compliant devices - and ofc there is nothing Djay can do about this.
But about the other point (talks between Algoriddim and controller manufacturer), I respectfully disagree with you. Accepting that this does not need to improve won’t help Algoriddim long term. User complacency ( = “It’s okay, it is what it is”) kills businesses.
I also have a bit of an issue with Algoriddim saying the problem is Pioneer/Alpha Theta not opening their gear. Indeed, starting from a given hardware price, Recordbox and Serato are free (with DDJ-REV5 for example). So… there is not much software money to expect here for this manufacturer. They can only benefit from an additional software company (Algoriddim) bringing their own client to their gear. Therefore, to be honest, I find this whole explanation lacking substance a bit.
There is a real issue with Agoriddim’s go-to-market (imho) :
This two points are, imho, what is preventing Djay from really breaking out the next penetration level.
This is not sustainable as there is no point at having
Algoriddim should either do :
But the current positioning cannot work long term, imho.
You’re absolutely spot on @N_C
Have you ever seen a question, request, or bug report about the Looper or Video Transitions here?
I haven’t. Could that be because they work flawlessly—or because they’re rarely used?
I will address several aspects:
Resources vs. possibilities - MIXXX is free and offers greater controller support - it is possible, you just have to work first and not take profits - you are selling a product or the possibility of receiving a product with promised functions that are not even available in some cases (instructions vs. reality)
Controller support - full support is not provided even for flagship advertised devices, and the market is not sleeping. Mapping should be a priority if you want to have more users - “not everyone has to buy a garden to eat the fruit” - it is worth taking a look at Traktor and doing your homework
Identical versions for Windows and Mac - and therefore other devices - if you provide the program’s usability functions, it is worth taking care of each platform to have users.
Playlist - Recordbox is popular, you go to the club without stress, you do not need to duplicate devices, no one will whistle at the performance. VR functions - either it is a PRO program as the name suggests, or a platform for fun - you can develop the function even indicated but the priority should be the stability and availability of the functions that DJs need.
Support - it lies and whines, please do not write answers without testing based on the instructions only with iOS, recording videos by users and sharing is also poor, and in the response information about forwarding to developers, there are many of the same topics without a solution closed - I think you do not realize what consequences it has - you lose customers / users.
Efficiency vs. Quality - steam separation - I will only refer to the Windows version, the quality is worse than the competition regardless of the power of the computer used, there is already software that uses the computing power of the GPU for division and does it excellently - it is worth working on the function as one of the flagships.
Freedom that is lacking - give DJs some slack, the software is hard to adjust to your own preferences - not everyone plays the same way (including MIDI mapping)
I think that the program has a future but it has to take into account the opinion of users and research the market even every day and work on its “child” because it still has a long way to go in development but without us it can be difficult, I already wrote in one post that you should add “BETA version” to the name if you intend to develop it at such a pace - this is my personal feeling when I have MIXXX, Recordbox, Serato, Traktor and VirtualDJ at hand.
I am waiting for effects worth this price 
but not forever.
DJAY Pro playlists should be synced across any device with the app installed and logged in. If they can sync hot cues they should be able to sync playlists. It is strange that it’s taking this long. I can’t imagine what the blocker is or how it could be something DRM-related.
Also, I disagree with stopping supporting so many controllers due to the fact the more controllers they support the more users they’ll get. Supporting the more professional controllers should be a given along with making apps bug free.
