Thanks a lot, @Gianni_Notarnicola, for bringing this issue to attention.
It’s already been 5 months since I submitted this request, which looks a lot like yours:
Would you be able to read through it and see if we are both highlighting the exact same points? Do we have the same goals here? My main frustration is that not much has really improved in the software, especially regarding these specific issues.
Due to the low release and improvement rate from Algoriddim, it feels like we’re running in circles. Users keep writing and submitting similar improvement requests, but because of the slow release cycle, users become disengaged, and the requests fade away—only to be brought up again by another highly involved user. (In fact, I’m noticing more and more “need-to-haves” being recycled in this way.)
However, considering the number of votes on my request (18 votes) and yours (9 votes right now), it seems we’ve gained some involvement, which will hopefully lead to some priority for this development. Don’t you think?
