SAMPLING RATE 88200 HZ 96000 HZ (And 192000 Hz) Stems problem

Bug Reports
1

SAMPLING RATE 88200 HZ 96000 HZ (And 192000 Hz) Stems/audio separation problem

Hi,

Even with latest 5.1.6 version ,NEURAL MIX (MAC Audioshake / M1/M2/M3 processor)

Audio separation work only at:

44100 Hz
48 000 Hz

if i set my ZEN GO antelope,or DJM mixer at 88200 or 96000 Hz:
audio seperation doesn’t work correctly : artefacts very bad audio quality / drops / strange sound.
i’ve tried all audio pro audio card and mixer : Motu, RME, Universal… DJM… it’s a SRC problem in DJAY NEURAL MIX at 88200 and 96000 (AND 192000 Hz)

It’s easy to reproduce for Djay engineers:

connect DJAY Pro to a DJM miixer or pro audiocard and set the audio resolution at 96000 Hz, and you will hear that audio separation sound very bad.

Compare with DJM pioneer mixer at 88200 or 96000 or a classical audiocard (Motu…, Universal, RME…) at 44100 Hz and 96000 Hz and you will hear that STEMS sound very bad at 88200 and 96000 Hz (MAC version with audioShake stems on mac M1/M2/M3)

i’ve open a ticket support and i’ve never get an answer.

Rekordbox and VirtualDJ work at 88200 and 96000 Hz with Stems…

Regards,

Olivier F.

2

Hi @Olivier_Frappier, I have forwarded this to the engineering team for review. I’ll report back here when I have news. Thanks!

1 Like
5

Hi @Olivier_Frappier, the engineering team was able to reproduce this issue and is looking into a fix. Also our internal support team has received your ticket so I’m going to let them take it from here. I’ll mark this topic as closed for now, but please feel free to add any new information here as needed and I’ll pass it onto the other teams. Thanks!

7

Many Thanks :slight_smile: happy they are able to reproduce, and sure they will fix it

Great support :slight_smile:

Regards,

olivier F.

1 Like
8

You’re welcome @Olivier_Frappier. Thank you!

9

Hi,

Many thanls.

Happy they could reproduce :slightly_smiling_face:

great support and wait for the fix :slight_smile:

happy to help to improve this incredible DJ software with the best audio quality on the market.

Regards,

Olivier

Envoyé à partir d’Outlookhttp://aka.ms/weboutlook

1 Like
10

Hi,

Disapointed, still here in new update 5.1.7.

not resolved.

Regards,

Olivier F.

11

still here in new 5.1.7 update. not solved

12

Hi @Olivier_Frappier, you are correct. This was not addressed in 5.1.7. The engineering team is still working on this one. The fix is close to ready, but requires additional testing before it’s ready for release. Thanks for checking in.

1 Like
13

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

14
15

Hi,

Hope it will be fixed in next 5.2

Regards,

Olivier

1 Like
16

Continuing the discussion from SAMPLING RATE 88200 HZ 96000 HZ (And 192000 Hz) Stems problem:

Hello,

It’s partially fixed in 5.2

Work now at 88200 and 96000 Hz with Stems

but not work at 176400 and 192000 Hz in 5.2

but not it’s better : 96000 Hz (good for DJM at 96000 now)

regards,

Olivier

17

Thanks for the additional feedback @Olivier_Frappier. I’ve passed this onto the engineering team.

18

5.2.1 update :

Work at 88200 and 96000 Hz with Stems

but Still not work at 176400 and 192000 Hz in 5.2.1 (same as 5.2.0)

please fix this

20

Hi @Olivier_Frappier, the engineering team is still working on this, but they don’t have a definite release schedule yet. We will share more info when we have it. Thanks!

21

Thanks , still here in 5.2.2
and even 88200 and 96000 : stems engine quality is bad

So seems that Stems Engine can just handle 44100 / 48000 Hz

Just work Engine at 48000 and allow it to resampel at 88200/96000/192000, resample stems engine and it will work ? no ?

22

Hi @Olivier_Frappier, that is correct. This was not a part of the 5.2.2 update. I’ll let you know when this has been addressed. Thanks!

23

Still not fixed in 5.2.5, disapointed

24

Hi @Olivier_Frappier, yes the team is still working on this one. It’s likely not going to make it into djay until around 5.3. I’ll let you know when it has been addressed. Thanks!